Global Warming?

What speaks for it?

The ice is melting at the poles. The northern polar sea, which until quite recently was covered with ice all the year, is now increasingly open in the summer half of the year. Glaciers disappear and some are already gone. Its rains more than earlier and with growing incidents of floodings as a result, which ought to mean that the sea water evaporates faster and, therefore, the air over the Earth has a higher humidity. The mean temperature of the Earth is increased and continues growing.

See to this:

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/File:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png, https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png and http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/File:Instrumental_Temperature_Record_png ).

What speaks against it?

The winters have become colder than before. There is snow and ice in areas where this earlier was less common or even rare. It rather looks as if a new ice age is coming. The summers have become colder, with only shorter exceptions.

Added in October 2012: Yes, the weather has certainly become strange. Where I live, the spring is often colder than usual and the summer begins like hesitatingly and is unusually cool in the beginning. Therefore there are problems with some fruit trees and bushes. The flowers may come and then freeze, so that may will be little or no fruit in areas where that happens. Yet when the summer is finally here, it instead quickly becomes unusually hot and dry and it may hardly rain a drop for 2-3 months, which again negatively effects harvest of vegetables and fruits. This is a new phenomenon for our area. It occasionally did happen earlier, but only rarely and less severe.

Yet it now appears doubtful that this has to do with global warming, because new evidence indicates that there is no global warming! So what is the reason? HAARP experiments for the purpose of developing weather control for strategic use? Changes in the radiation from the Sun? Some influence from space? I suppose we will find out one day, but so far it is quite a riddle...

It now appears more probable than before that this issue of “global warming” is little more than a kind of a political game or a manipulation of public opinion... But for what purpose? An excuse to raise certain taxes and prices for various forms of energy, and for selling such things as energy saving lamps that turn out to do more harm to our health and the environment than good for saving energy, especially since this saving is really very minimal indeed in comparison with the huge energy consumption by industries and in the production of lots of really useless things we don’t need and hardly even want, pushed on the market with brutal advertising? Or a cover-up for experiments of a military nature (such as HAARP)?

It is a riddle how it can be that ice increases at the South Pole and shrinks and even disappears at the North Pole. See here. How can that be? Here is attempt to explain it within the frame of the alleged “global warming” – but it may rather be an attempt to try to “save” the warming theory...

Can that be put on a common denominator?

Many know the following experiment from physics lessons in the school. One puts a glass on a wet wooden plate and fills it with snow. Then a spoon of kitchen salt is poured in it and the contents are stirred. The snow begins to melt (like salt melts ice on the road). After a while, the glass is frozen to the wood plate and stuck to it! If you lift the glass, the plate comes with it. How can that be?

This experiment is a demonstration of the so called specific melting heat or heat of fusion (which is explained here: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Enthalpy_of_fusion). Melting requires heat energy and it is taken from the environment, in this case mostly from the wet wooden plate. Therefore, the glass freezes on to it. It will be the same way with the melting of the polar ice! The polar areas withdraw heat from neighboring areas for the melting of the ice (and these areas may even temporarily extend quite a bit towards the equator) and this environment becomes cooler. Heat energy actually flows to the polar ice and then into the sea with the water from the melting. This means that the increase of the mean temperature at the poles will exhibit a plateau until most of the ice has melted, and there not increase continuously, as it does as an average for the planet.

To this come meteorological disorders. Warmer air and from the melting still more cooled air from the poles mix and swirl around. This can lead to rather intensive storms.

Then there is another and really alarming effect. The golf stream is breaking up and disappears (see, a.o., here:
 https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/gulf-of-mexico-loop-current-broken-risk-of-global-climate-change-by-bp-oil-spill/ and also
 http://www.morningliberty.com/2010/09/08/gulf-oil-stream-gulf-ocean-is-dead-gulf-stream-has-stopped/)! The climate in Europe is so far highly improved by the golf stream and kept comparatively warm by it. This to an important extent life-sustaining stream is now becoming lost. Why? Like in the atmosphere, warmer and cold water mix in new ways and the sea streams become disordered. But beyond doubt the horrible oil catastrophe in the Golf will have added quite a lot to it!

It is rather a paradox than a contradiction!

Many are rejecting the idea of global warming. But here we have actually put apparently contradicting phenomena on a common denominator! It is simply so that we are on the “wooden plate”, which now, to make things worse, is loosing heat supply from its environment! The global warming will be real, but it is used (or rather abused) in an unjustified manner in politics. The citizens should bring sacrifice, e.g. paying “carbon tax”, for the security of those, who will then leave us in the lurch when things get worse. Who, however, rejects the idea of global warming will not have thought far enough, or is unaware of these physical principles.

Are the poles shifting?

When a car wheel is unbalanced it begins to rattle. Because of the melting of the polar ice, the Earth gets out of balance! It will hardly rattle, but slowly seek to compensate for the unbalance and it may wobble (even if we cannot perceive it – yet!). It seeks to find a new position of balance. It could happen that the geographic poles will change positions with the melting of the polar ice. It cannot be excluded that it could come to a flip of the Earth axis, as many predict for the future. Is that possible?

In this context the gyroscope effect is often referred to. The mass rotation would resist a shift of the Earth axis. But which kind of shift? Only a shift of the axis in its position in the solar system, in the ecliptic! But here we are dealing with something else! The position of the Earth axis will in this sense mainly remain unchanged, but the Earth shifts it position in relation to its axis! That is not contradicted by the gyroscope effect and it could under circumstances happen rather fast. And if it should happen fast, the seas will swash over with enormous tsunamis – just quickly move a glass full of water – … and doubtlessly tensions in the Earth crust will to a large extent make it break up: earthquakes and volcanic eruptions as never seen since very many millennia.

Furthermore the geographic and magnetic poles have separated and continue doing so. The magnetic North Pole at present moves at a speed of 40-60 km in the year towards Siberia. In the century that recently came to an end it already moved around 1000 km, as various websites report, a.o. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/12/1215_051215_north_pole.html and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_AffdEhbac&feature=player_embedded

For an actual overview of earthquake activities, see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKI4JC3vcFA&feature=player_embedded

Why are US government offices and institutions moving to Denver?

At present important institutions and government offices in the USA are quite silently moving to Denver CO. One by one and the media hardly reports about it. It hasn’t yet come to much public attention, since it occurs separately with one of them after the other (probably a president’s resident is also being prepared there). There are already removal companies (they advertise in the Internet), which aids companies and private persons in moving to Denver. Why do they all want to go there? The town is at a height of one mile above the sea level and is regarded as comparatively safe if it should come to enormous tsunamis and extensive floodings. Such a future scenario is hinted on by what was discussed above. But they may not be so well protected against earthquakes… and therefore miscalculate the situation…

To this I would like to refer to a remarkable video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuU0H0D-JuU&feature=player_embedded

and here is another one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQLV5pb5OSQ&feature=player_embedded.